Что ж, следим за диффамационным процессом века — Ханс Ниманн против Магнуса Карлсена, Chess.com и Хикару Накамуры. Жесткость исковых формулировок зашкаливает:

Notorious for his inability to cope with defeat, Carlsen snapped. Enraged that the
young Niemann, fully 12 years his junior, dared to disrespect the “King of Chess,” and fearful that the young prodigy would further blemish his multi-million dollar brand by beating him again, Carlsen viciously and maliciously retaliated against Niemann by falsely accusing Niemann,
without any evidence, of somehow cheating during their in-person game and demanding that the
organizers of the Sinquefield Cup immediately disqualify Niemann from the tournament

202. Accordingly, Niemann is entitled to a money judgment against Defendants in an
amount to be determined at trial, but not less than $100,000,000, including compensatory, consequential, and punitive damages.

Полностью иск: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.moed.198608/gov.uscourts.moed.198608.1.0.pdf